In a recent column for the New York Times, Paul Krugman criticized the Obama administration for not advocating a sufficiently large stimulus package to invigorate the ailing economy. He poses the question: “Would the Obama economic plan, if implemented, guarantee that America avoids a lost decade?” His answer leaves room for doubt: “Not necessarily. A number of economists, myself included, believe the plan is inadequate and needs to be significantly expanded.” With this morning’s news reporting a loss of almost 600,000 nonfarm jobs last month—the largest monthly decline since 1974—the argument for government stimulus becomes increasingly compelling, especially in light of rising deflation threats.
If the current recession were a typical downturn, the investment landscape might seem more promising at this stage, over a year into the decline. Usually, such a timeline would signal an opportune moment to invest in anticipation of recovery. However, this recession departs from normal patterns, leaving many economic and financial indicators clouded, even amidst seemingly positive signs.
The market can be unpredictable. Is it a complex creature or simply grappling with its emotional responses, as Ben Graham once suggested? Regardless, staying alert and ready to act amidst market fluctuations is crucial. It’s easy to become ensnared in a narrow focus on recent trends, but losing sight of the broader strategic context is a common pitfall. An overreliance on short-term tactics can lead to significant issues if not balanced with strategic insights. While tactical analysis is vital, neglecting a higher-level perspective is akin to operating a vehicle with a faulty wheel—doable for a time but ultimately dangerous.
January proved challenging for many asset classes. While one might have hoped for a continuation of December’s rebound, which broke the persistent losses from September to November, the reality was a series of false starts in January. January’s losses were evident, although there were positive aspects compared to the previous months.
Fortunately, January was not an absolute disaster. This marks an improvement compared to the all-encompassing losses seen in September and October across major asset classes. However, the positive returns observed last month were largely dependent on high-yield, emerging-market, and inflation-indexed bonds.
The latest report on GDP for the last quarter of the previous year is disheartening, displaying a dramatic contraction. This 3.8% decline in Q4 2008 marks the deepest drop since 1982. Previous recessions, like in 2001, cannot compare to the current downturn, and even the 1990-91 slump seems mild by comparison as we navigate through the worst recession since the early 1980s.
Interestingly, although the consensus forecast anticipated a more severe decline of -5.5% for Q4, the realized contraction of 3.8% comes as a surprise amidst prevailing expectations.
In times of turmoil, it’s natural for people to seek hope and signs of better days ahead. Humans are inherently optimistic, but that optimism is currently being tested more than ever.
The press release following the latest FOMC meeting may provide insights into how the Federal Reserve plans to navigate the absence of conventional monetary tools. However, clarity may still elude us. The central bank is now experimenting with unconventional methods as it figures out its next steps.
In the past, an FOMC press release would draw significant interest for updates on short-term interest rate trends. With the effective Fed funds rate hovering around 0.16%, the direction of interest rates is far from ambiguous, with the answer largely predetermined.
Is it possible to find safety alongside higher yields? Typically, one must choose between the two. However, bonds issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (commonly referred to as Ginnie Mae) offer both aspects. In this edition of The Inside View, we explore Ginnie Mae bonds in a conversation with David Ballantine, lead manager of the Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX). Ballantine explains that Ginnie Mae bonds are fully backed by the U.S. government, which gives them credit quality on par with U.S. Treasuries, but they usually provide a yield premium over Treasuries—currently around 140 basis points higher, according to Ballantine.
Based on Morningstar ratings, Payden GNMA has performed remarkably well over the past five years among intermediate government portfolios. The 7.7% total return in 2008 reflected a strong showing amidst widespread losses in other capital markets. However, past performance does not guarantee future success, and the bullish trend that helped Treasuries and GNMAs thrive last year may not be replicated.
It’s also important to remember that Ginnie Maes carry prepayment risk, as they are mortgage-backed bonds. This risk can increase when interest rates drop, motivating homeowners to refinance. Despite the current low levels of interest rates, uncertainty remains about the future outlook for bonds in general, prompting further examination of the unique position of Ginnie Maes.
As investors search for safe havens with acceptable yields, this might be an opportune moment to delve into what Ginnie Mae bonds have to offer.
For more episodes of The Inside View, visit CapitalSpectator.podbean.com.
This morning’s update from the Conference Board regarding the leading economic index (LEI) indicates a slight increase last month. However, it’s crucial to note that this rise is neither surprising nor indicative of imminent economic growth.
As we previously discussed, monetary stimulus has been aggressive recently, which is artificially inflating many statistical measures designed to predict future economic activity, including the Conference Board’s LEI. Normally, such an increase would suggest that an economic rebound is on the horizon. Yet, due to the severity of current economic challenges, even significant monetary stimulus fails to create the expected effects.
According to the Conference Board’s press release, the LEI “rose modestly in December, primarily driven by substantial contributions from real money supply.” Additional positive contributions came from the yield spread, which helped counterbalance ongoing declines in building permits, average work hours, supplier deliveries, and initial unemployment claims.
A quick update for our readers: We’ve resolved a technical issue affecting Firefox users. A coding problem with the podcast player on our site was causing some difficulties with certain versions of Firefox, but that issue has now been addressed. There are still some concerns with the links at the top of the page when using Firefox, which we are working to rectify. In the meantime, Internet Explorer continues to function without any issues on our site.
