Princeton professor Burton Malkiel forecasts that “U.S. stocks should yield approximately 7%, five percentage points higher than the return on safe bonds” over the long term. In his latest article for the Wall Street Journal, Malkiel—a renowned author of the best-selling A Random Walk Down Wall Street —advises investors, “While stocks lagged behind bonds in 2011, it’s vital not to invest based on past performance. Currently, U.S. stocks, particularly via a broad-based index fund or ETF, present a more compelling option than bonds.”
According to the ADP Employment Report, job creation accelerated significantly last month. U.S. nonfarm private employment witnessed a seasonally adjusted increase of 325,000 in December, a notable jump from November’s 204,000. This increase represents the highest monthly gain recorded since 2000. In conjunction with this, initial jobless claims dropped by a substantial 15,000 last week, reaching a seasonally adjusted total of 372,000—the lowest since May 2008. It seems the labor market is gaining momentum, and the recent decline in jobless claims aligns well with expectations.
Financial Advice and Individual Investor Portfolio Performance
Marc Kramer (University of Groningen) | December 2011
This study explores whether financial advisers enhance the portfolio decisions of individual investors by comparing the portfolios of advised investors to those who are self-directed in the Netherlands. The results show significant differences in portfolio characteristics between these two groups, though they indicate no differences in risk-adjusted performance. Advised investors possess better-diversified portfolios with considerably less idiosyncratic risk. Furthermore, evidence suggests that when investors transition to receiving advice, much of this benefit stems from the advisory process.
The so-called January effect for the stock market (S&P 500) appears to be rather weak when evaluated on a monthly basis and doesn’t provide substantial encouragement as an indicator for returns over the following year.
In a previous post, I discussed the limited evidence for the January effect, which is expected to generate above-average returns during this month. While debunking this notion has held up over the past 10 to 20 years, it appears the numbers are even less favorable than I initially indicated. My earlier post inaccurately presented the sum of monthly returns; I appreciate everyone’s patience while I corrected the error. After recalculating based on the standard average of monthly returns, it becomes evident that the January effect is even more elusive than before.
Once upon a time, investors believed wholeheartedly in the January effect—an enticing concept suggesting that equity returns are more promising in the first month of the year. This notion, which dates back to economist Sidney Wachtel’s 1942 study on market seasonality, continues to garner interest and significant attention. However, recent history suggests that this investment theory is far less reliable than once thought.
The first significant economic report regarding the December economic profile indicates that economic momentum remains strong. The ISM Manufacturing Index rose by 1.2 percentage points to 53.9 last month, its highest level since April and marking an acceleration from November’s pace. If this initial assessment of 2011’s closing is indicative, the statistical case for a gradual economic improvement in the months ahead appears to be gaining strength.
2011 proved to be a challenging year for investors relying on a diversified portfolio to yield risk premiums. Bonds and REITs emerged as the clear winners among major asset classes. If your portfolio didn’t include a significant allocation to these sectors, your returns for the year were likely modest at best. U.S. equities saw a mild increase of about 1% overall in total returns, while international markets struggled with disappointing outcomes in dollar terms. Broad commodities also faced difficulties, although gold and oil each managed to rise around 10%.
As the new year begins, it’s time for predictions—lots of them. The arrival of a new calendar prompts an abundance of forecasts. Although predicting outcomes remains a challenge, we find it hard to look away, much like a highway accident. Keep your expectations realistic. “Ultimately, the only certainty is that the forecast will either be wrong or lucky,” warns the Colorado-based Business and Economic Research in its economic outlook for the upcoming year. “Regardless, the value of the forecast lies not in the numbers, but in the narrative.” It’s a complex and ongoing narrative, and here are some noteworthy predictions for your consideration—some may even prove to be accurate!
This section shares my second selection of top economic and finance books from 2011 (you can find Part I here). While this list is subjective, there are many notable books that won’t be mentioned. Though space on the internet is limitless, time is not. One standout title that deserves recognition is Pandora’s Risk: Uncertainty at the Core of Finance , authored by Kent Osband. This book should have been featured earlier this summer. Nevertheless, Osband effectively tackles the complexities of risk management in finance, providing readers with a thought-provoking and practical guide. Pay close attention to his innovative methods for measuring price volatility discussed in chapter 11. Meanwhile, here are some memorable titles that have made the cut in past Book Bits throughout the year:
### Conclusion
The articles present a comprehensive overview of various economic topics, including stock market predictions, employment trends, and investment insights for the coming year. By exploring these subjects, readers gain valuable perspectives on market movements, investment strategies, and the significance of economic reports, all of which contribute to informed decision-making in finance.