Categories Finance

Iran Fears Imminent Attack as Netanyahu Pressures Trump; Global Stocks Drop Amid Rising Oil Prices

[The latest update on the situation in Iran was prematurely published. Please check back at 8:00 AM EDT for the complete version.]

The words of Marguerite Yourcenar’s fictional Hadrian resonate profoundly: “I begin to discern the profile of my death.” This sentiment reflects less dread and more a sense of inescapable fate. Many commentators tracking the tumultuous Iran conflict, which has intensified the Saudi-Ansar Allah strife, share a similar mix of frustration and apprehension over what seems to be edging toward an inevitable escalation. Reports suggest that Netanyahu is encouraging Trump to act against Iran sooner than expected, perhaps before the midterm elections. Regardless of the truth behind these rumors, Iran seems to be bracing for potential conflict, interpreting the situation as dire. According to the Hormuz Report on Twitter:

BREAKING: Iranian officials now believe a joint U.S.-Israeli attack is imminent and instructing the country’s armed forces to immediately activate the decentralized “Mosaic Defense” doctrine. Commanders have reportedly received extensive lists of U.S. economic and political targets to strike if war breaks out, per Fars News.

A senior Iranian security official has cautioned that U.S. political assets and infrastructure in countries involved in the conflict could face direct attacks. The “Mosaic Defense” doctrine spreads military command across 31 provincial units, allowing Iran to continue its operations even if its central leadership is targeted.

However, PressTV’s homepage does not currently indicate that Iran is on heightened alert. Here’s a look at their site:

No new statements from Trump have emerged at Axios or on Truth Social.

The Times of Israel’s homepage suggests that the plan remains to strike after the U.S. midterms:

Iran may be alarmed by a recent story from the Financial Times indicating that Netanyahu was planning to reinitiate strikes against Iran earlier this month:

Benjamin Netanyahu is advocating for the resumption of extensive strikes against Iran, having instructed his military to prepare for a significant new offensive earlier this month. This course of action risks plunging the region back into full-scale warfare.

The Israeli military had readied plans for a multi-day bombing campaign aimed at civilian infrastructure, including power plants, nuclear facilities, and other regime targets. However, this mission was ultimately halted due to President Donald Trump’s opposition to reigniting the conflict before the U.S. midterm elections on November 3.

Both Trump and Netanyahu, who is gearing up for a challenging re-election campaign, continue to threaten a new offensive against Iran, asserting that the U.S. and Israel must “complete” the task at hand against the regime.

The upcoming bombing campaign was reportedly intended to surpass the intensity of the previous joint U.S.-Israel offensive against Iran that commenced in February.

Al Jazeera’s live feed recently reported: Netanyahu denies a UK media report claiming that Trump halted a planned Israeli strike on Iran.

In my view, the Financial Times story seems credible.

Netanyahu is seemingly attempting to provoke Trump into action before the elections. According to the Hormuz Report on Twitter:

BREAKING: Netanyahu has announced that he has ordered the IDF, Mossad, and all security agencies to prepare for the overthrow of Iran’s leadership, claiming that Tehran is once again pursuing nuclear weapons and asserting that “regime change is the only way to eliminate the threat,” per Israeli media.

In addition, reports indicate that Iron Dome Tamir interceptor missiles were observed being transported in northern Israel for defense battery loading.

This follows Trump’s intervention earlier this month, which halted an Israeli multi-day bombing campaign that was already in place due to concerns over an energy price surge before the upcoming U.S. midterms. With air defenses reloading and Netanyahu directing the dismantling of Iran’s leadership, the region is bracing for a confrontation that Washington has been trying to avert.

Additionally:

From dana on Twitter:

🇮🇱🇺🇸⚔️🇮🇷 Haaretz reports that the potential for renewed hostilities with Iran has caused significant disagreements between the military and Netanyahu in recent weeks.

Netanyahu and political leaders are at odds regarding the timing, necessity, and the U.S. stance on a renewed attack on Iran.

Concerns about how an attack on Iran could affect Israeli elections have been discussed between military and intelligence officials.

Intelligence experts believe Netanyahu is overstating the immediate threat posed by Iran.

PressTV’s main story highlights more vessel strikes in the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters has posted but not confirmed reports that Iran’s IRGC Navy claims to have attacked seven vessels and warns the U.S. of broader consequences.

The overall picture appears dire, even if specifics are murky. The U.S. has announced significant plans for a three-day strike, despite a reported lack of precision munitions, intended to coerce Iran into submission. Thus far, Iran has dismissed outreach from Pakistan, maintaining that its seven-point proposal remains valid.

Concerns persist regarding the potential use of tactical nuclear weapons by the U.S. or Israel, but such an escalation seems more probable if current efforts fail. The U.S. has identified traditional targets such as Kharg Island and Pickaxe Mountain, which could indicate overconfidence or intentional misinformation. Trump has alluded to the MOAB, which, if deployed over a city, could lead to substantial civilian casualties.

A short, intense campaign would likely rely on less sophisticated munitions, increasing the risk for pilots who would need to enter Iranian airspace.

A number of anti-imperialists are expressing disappointment over Iran’s current restraint. Brett Erickson on Twitter has frequently commented on Iran’s underplayed aggressive potential. His latest insights include:

IRAN ANALYSIS: Contrary to claims made by many Western analysts suggesting Iran has “overplayed their hand,” I maintain that Iran has consistently UNDERPLAYED their hand.

They have been overly concerned with external perceptions, allowing moderates like Araghchi, Ghalibaf, and Pezeshkian to hinder more hardline factions from taking stronger actions.

This dynamic is shifting, as indicated by recent statements from Ghalibaf and an op-ed by Abbas Araghchi published this morning in the Financial Times, alongside the sidelining of Pezeshkian.

If the U.S. and Israel revert to all-out war, Iran will be compelled to employ more extreme measures that they have so far avoided.

It would be a significant mistake, analogous to the decision to instigate the war initially, for President Trump to reignite full-scale hostilities against Iran in the near future.

As many are aware, Iran has warned that it would target U.S. economic assets, potentially disrupting services for Google, Meta, and Amazon. Increased assaults on U.S. bases also seem inevitable. Despite avoiding direct confrontations with Israel to prevent giving them a pretext for further strikes, Iran’s restraint is likely to diminish given Israel’s declarations regarding their intentions to lead the next assault. If the U.S. attacks Iran’s power infrastructure, one must question why Iran wouldn’t reciprocate by severely damaging Israel’s grid. Additionally, how much restraint will Iran exercise if they fear Israel might resort to nuclear options?

Despite numerous threats from Iran, there is skepticism about their willingness to inflict extensive damage on energy assets or desalination plants unless a nuclear attack occurs, as such actions could provoke Chinese disapproval. Nonetheless, selective damage may still be executed to make a strong statement. China is presently navigating a challenging situation due to bunker fuel shortages across Asia. This shortage is critical as bunker fuel powers ships. According to Lloyd’s List in Asian bunker supplies are under strain:

  • Vessels in Singapore must place bunker orders up to two weeks ahead due to prolonged wait times.
  • Typhoon Champi has disrupted bunkering activity in Zhoushan, further straining availability.
  • Russia has turned to China amidst fuel shortages, compounding supply issues in Asian bunker markets.

As a result of the Hormuz crisis, Asian bunker markets remain tight, leading to elevated prices and raising the likelihood of further increases in the coming year.

In relation to the Saudi-Ansar Allah conflict, it was recently reported that the U.S. has ordered the evacuation of most embassy staff in Saudi Arabia. Note that earlier reports inaccurately indicated that this order also applied to the UAE, Jordan, Qatar, and Bahrain.

In addition:

Two updates from the Middle East Eye live feed:

One fatality and eight injuries reported in the attack on Saudi Arabia’s King Fahd airport, with some reports updating this to two fatalities.

The Yemeni government states that Houthis targeted al-Mukalla and Aden airports.

Moreover:

10,000 militants may not seem like many:

The Financial Times leads with this coverage:

From the article:

Rising oil prices have led to a sell-off in global equities, with Wall Street set to take a notable downturn because the Middle East conflict and Eurozone debt concerns unsettle financial markets.

Brent crude has surged by up to 3.5 percent, reaching $112.68 per barrel, marking levels last observed during the early phases of the Iran war, following an escalation in attacks by Iran-backed Houthi militants against Saudi Arabia.

Meanwhile, futures linked to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 plummeted by 1.8 percent as investors shied away from riskier assets, while the blue-chip S&P 500 index dipped by 1.1 percent. The region-wide Stoxx 600 Europe index fell by 1 percent, influenced by increasing worries surrounding the bond markets in France amidst escalating yields.

Ten-year U.S. government bond yields saw a decrease of 0.09 percentage points to 5.08 percent, indicating a potentially strong performance in the market.

Bloomberg, however, presents a more optimistic outlook, reporting that physical oil prices have dropped even as crude futures rise. This distinction is noteworthy as paper oil pricing primarily reflects speculation about the outcomes of the Iran conflict rather than actual market conditions. From the report:

  • Brent futures are nearing a five-month peak at $112, driven by speculation regarding whether the U.S. will escalate its actions in Iran post-midterms.
  • In contrast, dated Brent, a measure of the actual value of physical barrels, has plunged to around $120, reflecting a decline of approximately $15 within a matter of weeks due to the relative stability of shipments through the Strait of Hormuz.
  • The divergence between futures and physical prices hints that futures might tumble in the coming weeks, though some traders assert that betting against fresh supply disruptions is risky given the current landscape and depleted oil stocks.

The Wall Street Journal did not endorse a major story recently claiming that oil flows out of the Strait of Hormuz are actually above pre-war levels. For thoroughness, the report states: More Oil Is Now Coming Out of the Persian Gulf Than Before the Iran War. Critics from programs like Dialogue Works have taken issue with the article’s analytical framework, arguing it misrepresents outcomes. Even if Gulf export figures are accurate, the framing misleadingly attributed the rise to U.S. efforts while failing to adequately mention alternative routes for oil exports, including transport via the Red Sea and over land.

In a significant piece, Larry Johnson invokes insights from oil expert Karl Miller to counter claims from Saudi officials who assert that their oil infrastructure is largely intact. From Riyadh Says Its Oil System Is Intact. The Numbers Say Otherwise:

Earlier this month, Aramco’s chief executive Amin Nasser confidently stated, “Our system is intact,” assuring markets that Saudi Arabia could quickly restore its full production capacity of 12 million barrels daily.

However, if Miller’s assertions hold true, Nasser may have misled investors. Further in the article, it states:

Karl Miller has conducted an extensive operational assessment of Saudi Arabia’s energy infrastructure, clearly delineating confirmed damages from exaggerated claims. Even with rigorous methodology, the outlook is grim.

Pre-war, Saudi Arabia produced about 10.88 million barrels per day in February. By September, this figure was still lagging behind by 2.51 million barrels daily—a 23 percent reduction.

According to Aramco’s own records, production fell from 10.56 million barrels in the first quarter to 7.57 million in the second—a staggering 28 percent decline in just one quarter.

Moreover, export numbers reflect a similar trend, falling from 7.27 million barrels per day in February to 3.70 million by August, constituting a 49 percent decrease. While recovery to 5.62 million barrels was reported in September, that still marks a 23 percent drop from pre-war levels.

Injuries to critical facilities, like the Abqaiq complex, where much of Saudi Arabia’s light crude is conditioned, were sustained back in July. In March, some 2 to 2.5 million barrels per day were curtailed across offshore fields. In addition, multiple refineries have been damaged or shut down, and fuel transport infrastructure is in decline.

Regarding refinery output:

The most worrisome statistics from Miller’s account involve refined products. By July, production from refineries was down by 534,000 barrels daily compared to February—a nearly 18 percent decline. Diesel production dropped by 21 percent, while diesel exports plummeted by 47 percent, and gasoline exports declined by 40 percent.

To cover these shortfalls, Saudi Arabia has been depleting its storage reserves.

For a deep dive into the details, I recommend reading the complete article here.

In contrast, the Wall Street Journal may be closer to the truth with its headline, Iran’s Fleet of Shadow Tankers Has Run Out of Oil After Monthslong U.S. Blockade. Numerous reports indicate “no loadings” at Kharg Island, although commentators like Professor Mohammed Marandi assert that Iran may still be managing to export oil through other channels.

Throughout the conflict, Iran relied on a significant buffer of oil tankers holding millions of barrels, which were safely positioned in Asian waters. Tehran effectively sold this oil to China, generating crucial revenue. However, by mid-October, this floating reserve has been depleted owing to ongoing U.S. naval blockades.

“Currently, there’s no oil left to discharge to China,” said Homayoun Falakshahi from Kpler.

Kpler’s analysis faced backlash on social media for allegedly skewing data to align with the accepted narrative.

Lastly, here are some notable new developments:

In conclusion, the evolving dynamics in the Iran conflict suggest that tensions are likely to escalate, with significant implications for the region and global markets. The military posturing and economic ramifications necessitate ongoing monitoring, as both sides prepare for potential confrontations that could further alter the geopolitical landscape.

Thank you for following this important story. Stay tuned for more updates!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

You May Also Like