Investment Overview: EMLP vs. ICLN
The First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) represent two distinct approaches to investing in the energy sector.
- EMLP focuses on North American fossil fuel and utility infrastructure, making it an actively managed choice aimed at stable returns from utility operations.
- ICLN, on the other hand, offers a broader perspective on global renewable energy investments, tracking the transition towards greener technologies.
Snapshot of Key Metrics
| Metric | ICLN | EMLP |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | First Trust |
| Share Price | $17.83 | $44.19 |
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.95% |
| 1-Year Return | 25.7% | 20.0% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.1% | 2.8% |
| Beta | 1.11 | 0.56 |
| AUM | $2.2 billion | $4.2 billion |
Beta measures volatility compared to the S&P 500. The 1-year return indicates total return over the trailing 12 months.
Performance & Risk Comparison
| Metric | ICLN | EMLP |
|---|---|---|
| Max Drawdown (5 years) | (57.2%) | (14.6%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $824 | $2,139 |
Fund Composition
-
EMLP holds 65 positions, with a focus on energy infrastructure (48%) and utilities (46%). Major holdings include:
- Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (8.97%)
- Energy Transfer LP (8.06%)
- Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (4.49%)
-
ICLN contains 106 holdings with a tilt toward:
- Utilities (40%)
- Energy (29%)
- Industrials (24%)
Major holdings include: - First Solar (7.94%)
- China Yangtze Power Ltd A (7.66%)
- Bloom Energy (7.36%)
Investment Potential and Considerations
The energy sector is undergoing significant changes, driven by increased electricity demand and advances in technology, including artificial intelligence.
-
ICLN is well-suited for those looking to invest in the clean energy transition. Its one-year return has outperformed EMLP, and it provides access to innovative companies in the renewable space.
-
EMLP offers higher dividends and lower volatility, making it appealing for income-focused investors. Its focus on traditional energy infrastructure means it remains insulated from commodity price fluctuations, which can attract conservative investors.
Conclusion
Which fund is the better buy depends on your investment priorities. If supporting the clean energy transition is your main goal, ICLN is a solid choice. However, if you prefer stable income with lower volatility, EMLP could suit your needs better. Both funds offer unique advantages and can play different roles in a diversified portfolio.
