In New Hampshire, the state Senate is reconsidering a proposal aimed at prohibiting the use of SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) benefits for purchasing candy and soft drinks. While some lawmakers support the idea, they recognize that the proposal requires further refinement before it can be enacted.
The New Hampshire Senate appears to be backing away from an effort to stop SNAP food assistance benefits from being spent on candy and soft drinks.
Some senators said they like the concept, but they believe the proposal needs more work before it can be implemented.
“I don’t think candy bars would ever be taught in a high school nutrition class as supplemental nutrition,” said state Sen. David Rochefort, R-Littleton.
The Senate Health and Human Services Committee is overhauling a bill to ban SNAP benefits from being used to buy candy and soft drinks. Some Republicans supportive of the concept said it’s not something that can be put into practice right away.
>> Download the free WMUR app to get updates on the go
“Although I personally don’t think that taxpayer money should be buying food that has zero health benefits, I also appreciate the fact that this is a very complicated and complex issue,” Rochefort said.
Other Republicans stated that this has been a longstanding issue, and action needs to be taken.
“There’s always going to be opposition on fixing this program,” said state Sen. Kevin Avard, R-Nashua. “We have talked about this many times in the past. It just keeps coming up. It’s an issue everyone’s been concerned with since I’ve been up here.”
The newly amended version of the bill would create a commission to explore how to promote healthier food choices for SNAP recipients. Some lawmakers suggest that providing incentives to stretch assistance dollars for fruits and vegetables may be more beneficial than outright bans on candy and soda.
“I think that’s a better way to get people to start thinking of their health,” said state Sen. Pat Long, D-Manchester.
Gov. Kelly Ayotte stated that she will refrain from commenting and allow the Legislature to resolve the issue.
“It’s much easier to say, ‘No junk food,’ than it is to implement no junk food,” Rochefort said.
Key Takeaways
- The New Hampshire Senate is revisiting a proposal regarding SNAP benefits and junk food.
- Some senators believe the proposal needs further development before implementation.
- The Senate Health and Human Services Committee is working on revisions to the bill.
- Some lawmakers argue that promoting healthy food choices may be more effective than bans.
- Gov. Ayotte is allowing the Legislature to address the matter without her input.
FAQ
What is the purpose of the proposed bill in New Hampshire?
The bill aims to restrict the use of SNAP benefits for purchasing candy and soft drinks.
Why do some senators support the proposal?
They believe it aligns with promoting healthier choices among SNAP recipients.
What are some concerns regarding the implementation of the proposal?
Lawmakers have voiced that the proposal requires more work and consideration of its complexities.
How are lawmakers suggesting to encourage healthy eating instead of bans?
Some propose creating incentives for purchasing fruits and vegetables with SNAP benefits.
Has the governor taken a stance on this issue?
Gov. Kelly Ayotte has chosen not to express her views and allows the Legislature to handle it.
As discussions continue, the focus remains on finding a balanced approach to support healthier food options for low-income families. The outcome of these deliberations could significantly influence how SNAP benefits are utilized in the future.
