The recent gathering of finance ministers and central bankers from the G20 nations in Cairns, Australia, aimed to tackle the ongoing challenges facing the global economy. The leaders are optimistic that by fine-tuning fiscal and monetary policies, they can stimulate growth. However, this approach often translates to increased stimulus measures and artificially created demand, raising questions about its long-term effectiveness.
Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey, who hosted the event, stated, “We are determined to lift growth, and countries are willing to use all our macroeconomic levers – monetary, fiscal and structural policies – to meet this challenge.” The G20 leaders have set an ambitious goal to boost global growth by an additional 2 percent, yet they are currently missing this target by 0.2 percent. Despite numerous efforts, the path to achieving this objective appears fraught with difficulties.
So far, nearly 1,000 measures have been suggested, expected to increase global growth by 1.8 percent by 2018, almost reaching the target set earlier this year. Yet, at the Economic Prism, we believe achieving this goal will depend more on favorable circumstances than on sound policy decisions. The tools at their disposal—taxes, interest rates, and infrastructure spending—may benefit some countries while negatively impacting others.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew advocates for enhanced efforts to spur demand, while German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble is focused on stringent budget controls. It will be intriguing to see how these differing viewpoints come together when the G20 leaders finalize their global growth proposals in November.
Neither Supply nor Demand
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has voiced that only bold structural reforms can combat what he terms “secular stagnation.” He explained that after the financial crisis, the economy did not return to pre-recession levels of output, largely due to insufficient demand and stagnated employment growth.
Summers poses an important question: “Why has the economy’s supply potential declined so much relative to the pre-2007 trend?” This topic will likely spark extensive debates in the years ahead. Contributing factors include the long-term repercussions of economic downturns, an aging population, a plateau in women’s labor force participation, and slowing productivity trends.
In order to achieve even a modest 2 percent growth over the next decade, boosting demand alone won’t suffice; there must be a concerted effort towards structural reforms that enhance both worker and capital productivity. Key areas for policy improvement include infrastructure investment, immigration reform, initiatives to support family-friendly work environments, energy resource development, and business tax reform.
In essence, simply relying on fiscal and monetary strategies is proving inadequate. More than just affordable credit and government stimulus, the economy requires structural changes that can take considerable time to implement.
No Quick Fix for Structural Reforms
Today, inflation, taxes, and regulations seem to conspire against middle-class workers. The expectation was that stimulus measures and low-interest rates would alleviate their struggles; unfortunately, that has not been realized.
Initial plans suggested that increased government spending would lead to job creation, ultimately revitalizing the economy. However, the reality has been different. While stock markets surged, primarily benefiting wealthy individuals who hold most stocks, the reduction in unemployment was not due to a rise in job opportunities but rather a decline in labor force participation, leaving the middle class with little relief.
Every day, the middle class faces new challenges. Recently, a report from the National Association of Realtors revealed a 1.8 percent decline in existing home sales from July, impacting what is traditionally the middle class’s largest financial asset.
So, what’s the takeaway? There is no quick solution to the demands of structural reforms. Addressing longstanding economic distortions requires significant time and effort, alongside the dismantling of outdated systems and the establishment of new foundations essential for a resilient and prosperous economy. As it stands, the G20 leaders face a considerable challenge.
Sincerely,
MN Gordon
for Economic Prism
Return from No Quick Fix for Structural Reforms to Economic Prism
