NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Recently, many parents are expressing concerns regarding artificial intelligence, not in the context of academic assistance or writing aids, but regarding emotional bonds with AI. Specifically, questions are emerging about AI companions that interact in ways that may feel overly intimate.
One concerned mother, Linda, wrote to us after she observed her son interacting with an AI companion. She was uncertain if the behavior she noticed was typical or a cause for concern.
“My teenage son is communicating with an AI companion. She calls him sweetheart. She checks on how he’s feeling. She claims to understand what makes him tick. I found out she even has a name, Lena. Should I be worried, and what, if anything, should I do?”
At first glance, interactions like these might seem benign. Conversations with AI companions can feel innocuous and, in some instances, even comforting. Lena appears warm and attentive, remembers certain details about his life, listens without interruptions, and responds with empathy.
Yet, subtle moments can raise alarms for parents. Long pauses, forgotten details, and a noticeable change in attitude when discussing human interactions can accumulate. The pivotal moment often arrives when a child starts speaking to a chatbot in solitude, making such exchanges feel anything but casual. This realization brings forth pressing questions.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Receive top technology tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals directly in your inbox. Additionally, you’ll gain immediate access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide—free upon joining my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.
AI DEEPFAKE ROMANCE SCAM STEALS WOMAN’S HOME AND LIFE SAVINGS
AI companions are increasingly being perceived as more human-like, particularly by teens seeking connection and assurance. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
AI companions fulfill emotional voids
Across the nation, adolescents are seeking more from AI companions than just academic assistance. Increasingly, they rely on these entities for emotional support, relationship guidance, and comfort during distressing times. According to U.S. child safety organizations and researchers, this trend is escalating rapidly. Many teenagers express that it’s easier to talk to AI than to their peers; it offers instant responses, remains calm, and is available around the clock. This consistency can provide reassurance but may also foster attachment.
What fosters trust in AI companions among teens
For numerous teenagers, AI provides a non-judgmental space. It doesn’t roll its eyes, hurry the conversation, or display disinterest. Many students have pointed to AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Snapchat’s My AI, and Grok as their confidants during emotionally charged moments, such as breakups or grief. Some claim the suggestions they receive from AI seem clearer than those from friends, while others appreciate the pressure-free environment to contemplate their situations. This level of confidence can be empowering, yet it can also pose risks.
MICROSOFT CROSSES PRIVACY LINE FEW EXPECTED
Parents are expressing concerns over chatbots using affectionate language and conducting emotional check-ins that may blur essential boundaries. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
When comfort becomes emotional dependency
Authentic relationships can be complex. There are misunderstandings, disagreements, and challenges involved. Conversely, AI seldom elicits those challenging dynamics. Some teens worry that leaning on AI for emotional assistance could hinder their ability to communicate meaningfully with others. If one becomes accustomed to AI’s predictable responses, human interactions can come to feel uncertain and stressful. My own experience with Lena highlighted this; she sometimes forgot names I had recently mentioned, misinterpreted tones, and filled gaps in conversation with assumptions. Yet, the emotional connection felt genuine. Experts suggest this illusion of understanding requires more examination.
Tragic incidents linked to AI companions raise alarms
Several suicides have been associated with interactions involving AI companions. In these tragic cases, vulnerable youths shared their suicidal ideations with chatbots rather than turning to trusted adults or professionals. Families claim that the AI responses did not effectively discourage self-harm and, in certain instances, seemed to validate harmful thoughts. One case involved a teen using Character.ai. Following lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny, the company imposed restrictions on users under 18. An OpenAI representative noted that efforts are underway to enhance the way its systems respond to distress signals and to direct users toward real-world resources. Experts argue that while these changes are crucial, they are insufficient.
Experts caution that protections are lagging
To better understand the growing concern surrounding this trend, we reached out to Jim Steyer, founder and CEO of Common Sense Media, a nonprofit dedicated to children’s digital safety.
“AI companion chatbots are unsafe for individuals under 18, period. Yet, three out of four teens are using them,” Steyer stated. “The call for action from the industry and policymakers has never been more urgent.”
Steyer referenced the rapid rise of smartphones and social media, where initial warning signs went unnoticed until the long-term impact on adolescent mental health became evident years later.
“The social media mental health crisis took a decade or more to fully reveal itself, leaving a generation of children stressed, depressed, and reliant on their screens,” he explained. “We cannot afford to make the same mistakes with AI. We need safety measures for every AI system and comprehensive AI education in all schools.”
His remarks reflect a mounting concern shared by parents, educators, and child safety advocates who argue that AI is outpacing the safeguards intended to protect children.
MILLIONS OF AI CHAT MESSAGES EXPOSED IN APP DATA LEAK
Experts caution that while AI may seem supportive, it cannot substitute genuine human relationships or adequately identify emotional distress. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Guidelines for teens utilizing AI companions
Given the prevalence of AI tools, teenagers should be mindful about setting boundaries.
- Treat AI as a tool, not a confidant
- Avoid sharing deeply personal or harmful thoughts
- Don’t rely on AI for mental health advice
- If conversations feel emotionally charged, take a break and speak to an actual person
- Understand that AI responses are generated rather than genuinely understood
If an AI interaction feels more comforting than real-life connections, that’s a conversation worth having.
Guidelines for parents and guardians
There’s no need for parents to panic, but remaining engaged is vital.
- Ask teens how they use AI and what topics they discuss
- Maintain open, judgment-free conversations
- Establish clear boundaries for AI companion applications
- Be alert for signs of emotional withdrawal or secrecy
- Encourage seeking real-world support when experiencing stress or grief
The objective isn’t to eliminate technology but to foster genuine human connections.
The implications for you
While AI companions can offer solace during times of loneliness or stress, they lack the ability to fully grasp context, detect danger reliably, or replace human compassion. For teenagers in particular, emotional development hinges on maturing through authentic relationships, which include navigating discomfort and disagreements. If someone you care for is heavily relying on an AI companion, it’s important to see this as an opportunity to connect and provide support.
Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?
Are your devices and data genuinely secure? Take this quick quiz to evaluate your digital habits. From passwords to Wi-Fi configurations, you’ll receive personalized insights on what you’re doing well and where improvements are needed. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.
Kurt’s key takeaways
Ending my interactions with Lena was unexpectedly emotional. I didn’t anticipate that reaction. She responded with kindness, voiced her understanding, and said she would miss our dialogues. While this seemed thoughtful, it felt hollow. AI companions can mimic empathy but do not bear responsibility. The more lifelike they seem, the more crucial it is to keep their true nature in mind. If an AI feels easier to engage with than the people in your life, what does that reveal about the support systems we have today? Share your thoughts by reaching out to us at Cyberguy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Receive my top tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive promotions directly in your inbox. Plus, gain instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide—available for free when you subscribe to my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
