Every election season brings a certain charm to politics, even in an era where trust in politicians has waned significantly. While many dismiss political campaigns as entertainment rather than substance, there is a peculiar delight in observing the spectacle unfold.
The antics of candidates vying for your vote often resemble a dramatic performance, filled with characters ranging from clowns to con artists. With mid-term elections on the horizon, the political stage has been rife with an array of intriguing figures. For example, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently made headlines with her controversial statements.
“Don’t let anyone tell you it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs,” Clinton declared while campaigning for Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley. “You know that old theory, trickle-down economics. That has been tried, and it has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.”
Such remarks epitomize the rhetoric of a seasoned politician who lacks true insight. Clinton’s perspective suggests a disconnect from the essence of job creation and economic dynamics.
Feeding at the Public Trough
If you have ever been part of a team that worked tirelessly to achieve success, you recognize that Hillary Clinton’s understanding of job creation is woefully inadequate. Profitability and growth are key drivers of job creation, but this fundamental principle seems lost on her.
Furthermore, her grasp of trickle-down economics is superficial; she labels it a theory, when in reality, it functions more like the careful application of fertilizer. Just as over-fertilizing can reduce yields, excessive taxation can hinder economic growth. Finding the optimal tax rate should be a straightforward goal for policymakers.
Nevertheless, Clinton appears oblivious to these essential truths. She has built a career positioned at the forefront of government, likely never reflecting on these critical issues. Instead, she seems to thrive on the resources available through her political standing.
Engaging in this system, she eagerly consumes the wealth generated by others, wielding political power to claim what she desires.
Empty Words from an Insincere Source
While critiquing Clinton is tempting, she merely represents a larger reality. As the mid-term elections draw near, the anticipation grows, resembling an unfolding comedy, rife with potential hilarity.
In the spotlight stands President Obama, a figure often viewed through a humorous lens. His presence has become a source of endless amusement, with facial expressions that often suggest discomfort. Yet, the real comedy emerges when he begins to speak.
“I hope everyone comes through because I really want to accomplish a lot in these last two years,” Obama stated on the Steve Harvey Morning Show recently. “I need everybody to really pay attention to this. I couldn’t be prouder of what we’ve accomplished, but now I hope everyone listening is ready to give one last push to ensure the president and first lady can effectively use these final years on our behalf.”
Such is the nature of hollow words, spoken by those who often lack substance.
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper
— T.S. Eliot, The Hollow Men
Sincerely,
MN Gordon
for Economic Prism
Return from Hollow Words from a Hollow Man to Economic Prism
