In a move reflecting ongoing debates about public health and nutrition, South Dakota lawmakers are urging the Rhoden administration to apply for a federal waiver that would prevent the use of SNAP benefits for purchasing soft drinks. Governor Larry Rhoden has raised concerns regarding the associated costs of state enforcement.
Legislative Progress
HB 1056 successfully passed the Senate with a vote of 27–6 and is now awaiting the governor’s decision. Rhoden agrees that sugary beverages should not be covered by SNAP but believes that such changes should originate from Congress rather than state legislation. He has refrained from disclosing whether he will veto the bill, characterizing the waiver approach on a state-by-state basis as indicative of dysfunction at the federal level.
Support for the Bill
Republican leaders have defended the bill, asserting that it represents a reasonable effort toward improving long-term health outcomes, although they acknowledge it does not implement broader restrictions. They addressed the governor’s concerns about costs, arguing that the potential health benefits significantly outweigh those concerns.
Next Steps
Once HB 1056 reaches his desk, Governor Rhoden has stated that he will carefully review the legislation before making a decision.
Key Takeaways
- South Dakota lawmakers are pushing for a federal waiver to restrict SNAP usage for soft drinks.
- Governor Rhoden supports the idea but believes it should come from Congress.
- The bill passed the Senate with a 27–6 vote.
- Republican leaders emphasize long-term health benefits of the proposed restriction.
- Rhoden has not indicated if he will veto the bill.
FAQ
What is SNAP?
SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) provides assistance to eligible individuals and families to purchase food.
What does HB 1056 propose?
HB 1056 aims to seek a federal waiver that would block the use of SNAP benefits for buying soft drinks.
What is Governor Rhoden’s stance on this issue?
He believes that sugary drinks should not be eligible for SNAP but prefers that such decisions come from Congress rather than state legislation.
What are the arguments for the bill?
Supporters argue that the bill is a reasonable measure to promote better long-term health outcomes.
What happens next with the bill?
After passing the Senate, the bill will be reviewed by Governor Rhoden before he makes a final decision.
