In today’s complex landscape, often described as a polycrisis, understanding the erratic behaviors and statements of influential figures such as Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, and various voting blocs can prove to be an arduous task. The question arises: Are these individuals confused, intoxicated, or deliberately misled?
The decline of late 20th-century corporate mass culture and the crumbling post-World War II liberal consensus have led to a fragmentation of shared information sources. By 2025, it has become increasingly difficult to discern the information each person in our lives consumes, as family members, colleagues, and acquaintances are often influenced by highly divergent narratives.
Let’s begin with Donald Trump, as he recently made several claims that starkly contradict widely accepted realities. His assertions about Ukraine’s victory and peace efforts in Gaza were already contentious, but he went further to make surprising statements that caught my attention.
On October 14, Trump met with Argentinian President Javier Milei, and the bizarre nature of their discussion was astonishing. Those who can stomach it should consider watching the full video.
One particularly outlandish claim he made concerns countries withdrawing from BRICS:
Donald Trump: I think if Biden would have, you know, Biden, that group would have gotten elected, meaning Kamala, you wouldn’t have the dollar as your currency anymore. You wouldn’t have world domination by the dollar if I didn’t win this election. And now the domination like BRICS. I told anybody who wants to be in BRICS, that’s fine, but we’re going to put tariffs on your nation. Everybody dropped out. They’re all dropping out of BRICS. BRICS was an attack on the dollar. And I said, you want to play that game? I’m gonna put tariffs on all of your products coming into the US. They said, like I said, we’re dropping out of BRICS and BRICS isn’t even talked about anymore.
Is it possible that he genuinely believes this? Are his aides misleading him about countries leaving BRICS? Are foreign leaders merely echoing what they think he wants to hear? Or is he consuming excessive amounts of Adderall that lead to such erroneous statements?
This perplexity compounds the already perplexing situation surrounding Milei’s presidency, along with a $20 billion U.S. bailout and Milei’s outrageous public appearances, such as his concert to promote a book:
ARGENTINA — after Trump sent his buddy Milei $20 Billion to prop up their economy (as they take market share from our farmers), Milei did a concert to promote his book (+ salvage his election)… while sprinkling in Hava Nagila to show fealty to Israel
Yes, this is real pic.twitter.com/BgcWntPyXL
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) October 7, 2025
Additionally, Trump’s effort to import Argentinian beef is creating challenges for American farmers, while Argentina takes a larger share of the Chinese soybean market, largely inaccessible to U.S. producers due to Trump’s tariffs.
A recent discussion on Bluesky sheds light on an often overlooked truth: society is awash in mind-altering substances, leaving many in a cloudy state of mind. Unfortunately, it is challenging to pinpoint who might be under the influence:
https://t.co/UUfDEWHxyI pic.twitter.com/VgDwgwdCXO
— Nat Wilson Turner (@natwilsonturner) October 19, 2025
I have also spent considerable time being unaware of substance abuse issues that I later discovered among acquaintances.
A 2024 Rolling Stone article revealed that the Trump administration had a troubling relationship with controlled substances:
In January, the Defense Department’s inspector general released a report detailing how the White House Medical Unit distributed controlled substances with scant oversight and even sloppier record keeping. The report highlighted that stimulants were commonly handed out to staffers who required energy boosts after late nights or needed a pick-me-up for another demanding day.
There’s reason to believe the party continues under Trump 2.0.
Transitioning to another topic, I was surprised to learn about the rumored connections between Trump’s Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski, who is speculated to be involved in campaign strategies for Trump 2024.
If you have been unaware as I was, the following overview from Lewandowski’s Wikipedia page will bring you up to speed:
During an immigration raid on April 8, 2025, Noem was accompanied by Lewandowski, who introduced himself as “chief of staff.” DHS later stated he is merely an adviser, but The Wall Street Journal described him as Noem’s “de facto chief of staff,” adding there were “White House concerns about their relationship.” After a disagreement about FEMA’s future, Lewandowski fired FEMA administrator Cameron Hamilton from his office.
On June 12, 2025, during a press conference, when U.S. Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly detained, Lewandowski intervened, shouting, “Let him go! Let him go!”
Lewandowski first met his future wife in high school and later faced accusations of sexual harassment, leading to his removal from a super PAC chairmanship. In September 2023, he was reported to have an extramarital affair with Noem, which she denied. However, reports in 2025 indicated that their romantic involvement was widely accepted among colleagues.
A piece in New York Magazine titled “Top Goon” offers insightful commentary:
“She’s going to play a key role in advancing Trump’s efforts to consolidate presidential powers,” remarked a former DHS official. Noem will be pivotal in shaping immigration policy, operating alongside a tight-knit inner circle that instills fear among staff. Lewandowski remains influential, effectively co-managing DHS without congressional oversight, while Trump’s immigration strategies continue to garner support among Republicans. Forget the divided views; her abilities make her a formidable spokesperson, yet she remains undervalued for future leadership possibilities.”
We must also address Noem’s recent purchase of private jets totaling $172 million.
I realize I am connecting topics somewhat haphazardly, mainly because I regret not including this in a previous discussion about Russell Vought and Stephen Miller.
Noem’s growing reputation as a potential presidential candidate prompts me to question the credibility of some media analysts.
Furthermore, a tweet illustrating Trump’s bizarre foreign policy perspective must be acknowledged:
Don’t be naive.
Venezuela isn’t some “independent” nation. We’re not sending 10k troops and 8 warships over drug dealers…. Trump is going after CHINA. Trump’s Venezuela offensive is a THIRD BLOW to Xi: Iran – Gaza – Venezuela. Just WATCH… pic.twitter.com/ftYoMLtWo1
— Chanel Rion OAN (@ChanelRion) October 17, 2025
Additionally, Larry Johnson shared similar delusions recently:
The signing of the Sharm El-Sheikh Peace Plan transformed everything. Countries lined up behind Trump, leaving only Putin and Xi out. Trump achieved the unthinkable and, in doing so, put Iran on the back foot. Now Putin faces increasing pressure with growing isolation as the world strives for peace and prosperity.
Vice President J.D. Vance echoed similar sentiments when he stated:
Vice President Vance: Our president’s approach to this conflict is firmly grounded in reality. Unlike the previous administration, where Russia made territorial gains, now they are losing ground considerably. The Russian economy is faltering, giving us a real opportunity for diplomatic talks.
On a related note, a recent report highlights the discrepancy between reality on the ground in Ukraine and the narratives being circulated, revealing attempts to conceal failures from vital stakeholders:
Azov Brigade leader Bohdan Krotevych disclosed that European partners are kept at bay to prevent them from witnessing the harsh realities of the current situation.
In other news, Trump is reportedly putting pressure on Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy to accept Russia’s terms for ending the conflict, demonstrating unpredictable stances on the war:
Trump’s meeting with Zelenskyy turned tense, with Trump cursing and tossing aside maps, demanding that Ukraine yield territory to Russia—this shows his erratic approach and alignment with Putin’s demands.
Shifting focus, Emmanuel Todd critiques the delusions of the European middle class:
He argues that the ambition to create a post-national Europe is fundamentally flawed, likening it to hysteria. The blend of expansion into ex-Soviet regions, coupled with Russophobia, is pushing Europe dangerously close to conflict. We observe significant psychological dynamics at play, marking a collective madness among influential classes.
To conclude our discussion on current political landscapes, we can turn to Kamala Harris, whose new memoir has received sharp critique for its lack of substance:
Harris’s campaign was characterized by a focus on image rather than tangible policy. Her memoir, 107 Days, reflects a political machination devoid of deeper convictions or values.
Finally, in a cautionary note, a content creator warns about an impending collapse of societal trust, deeply affecting individuals’ ability to engage in unscrupulous practices:
As trust erodes, those who thrive on deception may find it increasingly difficult to operate effectively, leading to inevitable societal upheaval.
In summary, as individuals and society grapple with fractured narratives and bizarre political antics, it becomes crucial to seek reliable information and engage with our current reality.
