Recent research suggests that individuals who abstain from meat might be less likely to celebrate their 100th birthday compared to those who consume meat. However, this conclusion is more nuanced than it may seem at first glance.
The study monitored over 5,000 Chinese adults aged 80 and above, participants in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, a national study initiated in 1998. By 2018, it was found that individuals on meat-free diets had a lower likelihood of reaching the age of 100 compared to their meat-eating counterparts.
On the face of it, this seems to contradict decades of research highlighting the health benefits of plant-based diets. Vegetarianism, for instance, has consistently been associated with reduced risks of heart disease and stroke, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. These advantages are often linked to higher fiber intake and lower levels of saturated fats.
Related: Reducing One Amino Acid Enhanced Lifespan in Mice by Up to 33%
So, what’s really happening? Before jumping to conclusions, it’s essential to take a look at several important factors.
Adapting Nutritional Needs with Age
This study specifically focused on adults aged 80 and older, whose nutritional requirements significantly differ from those of younger individuals. As we grow older, physiological changes influence both consumption patterns and the specific nutrients we require. Research indicates that energy expenditure decreases while muscle mass, bone density, and appetite commonly decline. These shifts elevate the risk of malnutrition and frailty.
Most studies highlighting the health benefits of meat-free diets involve younger adults rather than frail, older populations. Some studies suggest that older individuals who do not consume meat may be at a heightened risk of bone fractures due to insufficient calcium and protein intake.
In advanced age, nutritional focuses shift. Instead of aiming to ward off long-term diseases, the priorities often become maintaining muscle mass, preventing weight loss, and ensuring that each meal provides essential nutrients.
Consequently, the study’s results likely highlight the nutritional hurdles faced by the elderly, rather than indicating any intrinsic issues with plant-based diets. Importantly, this does not undermine the solid health advantages of these diets for younger, healthier individuals.
Related: Insights from Study of the World’s Oldest Woman on Living Past 100
It is crucial to note that the reduced likelihood of reaching 100 was specifically seen among underweight non-meat eaters. No such correlation was evident among older adults with a healthy weight.
Being underweight in older age is already strongly associated with elevated risks of frailty and premature death. Thus, body weight appears to be a significant factor in understanding these findings.
It’s worth considering that this was an observational study, which shows correlations rather than definitive causes. Just because two occurrences coincide doesn’t imply that one is responsible for the other.
The results also align with the “obesity paradox” in aging, where a slightly elevated body weight often corresponds with improved survival rates in later life.
Interestingly, the lower likelihood of reaching 100 was not observed in those who consumed fish, dairy, or eggs. These foods deliver essential nutrients critical for preserving muscle and bone health, like high-quality protein, vitamin B12, calcium, and vitamin D.
Older adults adhering to these diets have comparable chances of living to 100 as meat eaters. Researchers propose that incorporating modest amounts of animal-sourced foods may help prevent undernutrition and preserve lean muscle mass in advanced age compared to strictly plant-based diets.
Implications for Healthy Aging
Instead of debating whether one diet holds universal superiority over another, the key takeaway is that nutrition should be customized according to life stage. Energy needs decrease with age (due to reduced resting energy expenditure), yet some nutrient requirements tend to rise.
Older adults still need adequate protein, as well as vitamins B12, calcium, and D—essential for maintaining muscle mass and avoiding frailty. In later adulthood, the focus often shifts from preventing chronic diseases to avoiding malnutrition and weight loss.
Related: Centenarians Exhibiting a Unique Relationship with Disease
While plant-based diets can still be healthy options, they may require meticulous planning and, at times, supplementation to guarantee nutritional adequacy, especially in older age.
Ultimately, our nutritional needs at 90 may differ dramatically from those we have at 50, and dietary advice should reflect these transitions through life. Adjusting what works for you as you age is completely normal and necessary.
Chloe Casey, Lecturer in Nutrition and Behaviour, Bournemouth University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
