Yves here. I must admit that I’m not thrilled with how this post is framed. As Tom Neuburger quickly notes, the right wing isn’t a monolith; rather, it comprises various factions, each possessing distinct beliefs and policy priorities. It’s challenging to envision disparate groups with at best overlapping interests forging a unified, enduring coalition.
We currently find ourselves amid a conservative counter-revolution that has made significant strides and appears poised to gain even more ground. I often think of the French Revolution, which was characterized by a series of increasingly radical factions in power, escalating violence (like the Reign of Terror and then Thermidor), and an ambitious endeavor to reshape the social order and devise a new archetype of citizenship. However, the ensuing five years of instability and violence during the Directory culminated in the coup of 18 Brumaire, effectively ending the Revolution and transitioning to an Empire. Thus, a protracted phase of factional conflict and bloody retribution seems well within the bounds of historical precedent.
I reached out to Nat regarding Neuburger’s omission of black-pill nihilists in his analysis and asked for Nat’s thoughts on Neuburger’s observations overall. His response was as follows:
The young nihilists currently lack representation in power and do not possess a coherent ideology.
With someone like Fuentes, it’s hard to predict his ultimate trajectory. I had initially dismissed him as a #3 [“White supremacy & race restoration”], but then he spoke out against the Gaza genocide. While it initially seemed his stance stemmed from anti-Semitism, there appears to be some genuine humanity in his perspective.
We are in a tumultuous situation, and it may take decades (or perhaps years, if positive transformation accelerates) for coherent ideologies to emerge that align with our realities. Everything is uncertain.
By Thomas Neuburger. Originally published at God’s Spies
Note: The commentary below should not be interpreted as applying to us Muppets, the Littles, or the passengers on the wealthy’s train. While some Muppets may share these beliefs, none hold power. My focus here is solely on those who do—namely, the Masters and some of their Minions. In particular, I am referring to the influential Right-Wing machinery and individuals like Thiel and Vance, rather than the ordinary individuals among us who are their target audience.
Our robotic transhumanist future. Guess who will be in charge?
“I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
—Peter Thiel, Palantir founder, billionaire tech financier, and J.D. Vance supporter
For years, I’ve pondered, “What happens if the Right wins completely? What would the State look like? What do the Right and its leaders genuinely desire?”
These questions are fundamental, especially when considering a book on The Fourth American Constitution.
The issue is that the Right is not a singular entity but rather several factions with differing objectives. This division is evident in the mishmash structure of Project 2025, which features various authors and lists of desires, often filled with contradictions. As a result, the Right doesn’t possess a single agenda; instead, it comprises several conflicting ones.
Generally, the primary concerns of the far-right can be categorized as follows:
- God & control of sex: Traditional Religious Right advocates. Key figures include New Apostolic Reformation leaders like Brian Simmons, Ché Ahn, and Mike Bickle, along with public figures like Boebert and Charlie Kirk. Some Catholic and evangelical leaders are also part of this faction, which harbors a significant anti-female agenda.
- Cops & punishment of “the other”: This group champions prosecution and what they term justice. Notable examples are Stephen Miller and heads of the Constitutional Sheriffs. Those who emphasize “law and order” are part of this faction, with origins tracing back to slave militias, anti-union Pinkerton gangs, and anti-immigrant law enforcement.
- White supremacy & race restoration: This agenda is endorsed by various groups and their leaders, including Kris Kobach and Richard Spencer, alongside organizations like the Proud Boys and Moms for Liberty (yes, you read that correctly), as well as publications like The Daily Stormer.
- No restrictions on money: Fans of Ayn Rand. Libertarian leaders include figures like Charles Koch and George Bush, who advocate for financial freedom that supersedes national rights; they encompass bankers and hedge fund moguls seeking to accumulate even more wealth. While many hyper-rich individuals focus solely on wealth, some, like Howard Ahmanson, Jr., also align with other agendas. This faction is extensive as it involves many with actual wealth.
- “Endless war for eternal peace”:** This encompasses not only neocons but anyone primarily interested in perpetual warfare and its lucrative outcomes. Key decisions are influenced by figures like the late Dick Cheney and current politicians such as Marco Rubio, and this group has significant bipartisan support.
- Wannabe tech overlords: A relatively new faction led by affluent tech figures like Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen. These individuals fancy themselves visionaries akin to Steve Jobs. A libertarian offshoot, they are characterized by unique and striking ideas that share some overlap with libertarians and the endless warriors, while diverging significantly from both the race-driven and religious sectors of the Right.
While there are additional power centers with different agendas, these are the most influential.
How Will These Groups Unite?
Short answer: They will not, apart from natural overlaps. A deliberate adoption of each other’s agendas is unlikely.
Long answer: The power centers on the Right will compete until one faction consolidates sufficient power to fulfill its agenda. At that stage, other factions will receive whatever benefits they can from the situation. For instance, when the Bush-Cheney administration held power, the Interests of Money and Neocons thrived, whereas the White Restorationists suffered losses.
The One Common Element: Lust for Unlimited Power
If there is no singular Right Wing agenda, what keeps these groups unified? The answer is straightforward: power. All factions seek to exert control over those outside their circle.
Thus, when we consider — what does the Right truly desire? — the answer is simple: dominance. Their control interests may vary, but the thirst for power remains their true commonality. Koch might not be concerned about race as long as wealth is prioritized, while Stephen Miller insists on punishment without regard for religion. Similarly, radical Christian leaders prioritize punishing perceived immorality over wealth accumulation.
Elisabeth Moss in The Handmaid’s Tale, depicting a society governed by the Religious Right (Hulu/Youtube)
Our Wannabe Tech Overlords
Which faction will prevail, realizing its vision of the State first? Which right-wing agenda is on the verge of full implementation?
Currently, the Tech Overlords have a significant lead. They desire total control, eschewing even the pretense of supporting democracy. “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” declares billionaire Peter Thiel. They are keen on establishing an intrusive, unquestioned domestic security state.
Palantir Founder: ‘They need to wake up scared and go to bed scared’
A Palantir Primer: Tools for the Muscular State
They share this characteristic with many other factions, which is why the security state is resilient.
Despite their outlandish ideas — believing they can achieve immortality; proposing to relocate humanity to Mars as a solution to the climate crisis; endorsing “transhumanism,” which, beneath its surface, advocates for elitism — they have an unprecedented advantage in their perceived advancement and foresight. To many, they embody the legacy of Steve Jobs’ vision.
The Cult of the Airman, V.2
This aura is not a new phenomenon; it is a modern iteration of the “cult of the airman,” an optimistic misbelief that captivated the early 20th century before World War II.
During that era, it was believed that the technically advanced — in that case, pioneering aviators like Charles Lindbergh — possessed a unique ability to perceive the future and thus should lead. This was a misconception; Lindbergh was a well-known right-wing figure whom FDR suspected of Nazi sympathies. Yet, the illusion remains compelling.
Poised to Take Over
Despite their flaws, the Tech Right is well-positioned to take control. This discussion is lengthy, and I am sure that I and others will revisit this topic as it evolves. For now, consider this: The keys to victory are currently in place, and if JD Vance follows Trump’s path, this trajectory is unlikely to change.
(Click here to explore the complete, interactive infographic; it’s well-researched and an invaluable resource.)
So, what might transpire if the Right secures absolute power? The answer hinges on which faction prevails.
